There are plenty of roadmaps. What's missing is someone who actually builds. A report on what really goes wrong in AI projects.
Most AI projects don't fail because the wrong model was chosen. They fail because once the consultants leave, nobody's left to actually build the system. The consultant delivers a roadmap, the company nods along - then reality kicks in. Support tickets, holiday cover, day-to-day business. The AI initiative gets pushed back. Until nobody asks about it anymore.
I know the format: two days, good vibes, whiteboards covered in ideas. Then a handbook. Then silence. The problem isn't the workshop concept - it's that the output is a presentation instead of a system. That's why every workshop I run ends with something that actually works the following Monday. No roadmap. No homework. A result.
Consulting without hands-on experience is just theory. You can analyse processes, create market overviews, build decision matrices - and still have no idea how an automation workflow behaves when the API times out at 3am. Companies discover this difference the moment they start building.
"We can't do that because of GDPR" is the most common thing I hear before a project starts - and it's usually wrong. Powerful, compliant systems exist: self-hosted, on German servers, with proper data processing agreements. Anyone using GDPR as a blocker usually hasn't looked closely enough. Or doesn't want to start.
Strategy matters. But strategy without a working system is wishful thinking. Value is created the moment the first process runs automatically, the first hour is saved, the first employee uses the new tool and won't go back. Until then, it's all preparation. Necessary preparation - but not results yet.